C-182. ā€œGrow by (date)ā€

The other unborn (C-176)? Not only too little (C-181). Perhaps too late. And getting later….

The “Sell by (date)” protocol of the marketplace finds no “Grow by (date)” companion for our needed functionality (III:NF; nf:C-144) … there or elsewhere. Nothing like the dynamic profile analysis (DPA: App. XVII) assesses the sorry state of imbalances and consequent weak interdependencies in human endeavor (step making and taking). But we see indications looming ahead of us of this matter, as for example, in the global warming phenomenon. Increased world population and decreased resources add exacerbating factors to our failures to address and solve our fundamental, vexing, more and more forceful behavioral problem (I:Pbeh; C-41).

We see urgency too in our human Becoming’s (C-170) steadily increasing need for functionality (See C-115: “…f => nf => f => nf ...,”** after the Nature of Things’ initiating and continuing NF), in consequence of its general persisting conditions of partial order, consequentiality and discontinuity (III).

Come the behavioral revolution… The quiet revolution. In minding. The needed technological revolution re mind (an R-word: C-107). Throwing off the B-ness (C-176) of the B-transform’s oppression of functionality for the enabling freedom of the R-transform (C-111). The constructive revolution, to add to and improve on the limited functionality in and of B-protocol technology.

The clock is running … on more than the threat of nuclear oblivion.

* Cyberspace’s buffering of what is said about (WISA) won’t save us. No more than walls have or will. No more than seas will. Indeed, cyberspace’s cacophonous WISA bumping arounds are rife with dysfunction (e.g., “alternative facts,” fake news). Bringing unprepared step takers closer together invites more hard collisions. The unsolved Pbeh just keeps getting harder... and decision making more frantic (C-183).

** As this progression advances, it becomes more and more apparent that “survival of the fittingest” applies to step makers and takers (C-121) … lest they be drowned in the steady increase of functional particulars (bereft of applicable principles such as the requisites and imperatives of behavioral necessity: VI-XI), suffocated by Adopt’s decisional uncertainty (VIII) ... unless, lacking Adept’s compose capability, they opt for an Adopt package (e.g., “follower”) … or, attending to particulars, opt for Adapt re observed circumstances (C-9) – especially those circumstances showing some consistency (see the concept of “lawful” as that which is regular and frequent)) .

(c) 2017 R. F. Carter
S