C-246.1 Along the R-path to expansion
What do we amount to? What is the extent of our expansion, in quality as well as quantity? Do we use differentiations (e.g., our culture’s ways) but fail to differentiate in the things we do … and fail to do for lack of differentiate capability (e.g., not employing the pragmatic precept technology)? Is our ability to slice and splice stunted by differentiational weakness?
Just as we should sight along the line of the Expansion and its differentiation, so too should we view our lives by sighting along the line of our selves (individual and community) and our differentiating -- not across lives in the style of B-ness and B-speak. Too much behavior, past and possible, is otherwise forfeit. B-ness does not make enough of functionality in relation to needed functionality … as, for example, in the undifferentiated confusion between want and need.
Consider too the behavior between (the two cross-sectional views of) a “stimulus” and a “response.” Boring estimated there could be 30 or so intervening conditions. How many mettles? Which mettles? Any alloyed mettles? S-universe differentiation is the path to solving our Solve problem.
We humans are more like the Expansion than we are like the B-universe. In our functionality, that is. In the extent of our differentiation. We differentiate; we make steps (splicing), not just take them. In light of the Nature of Things.
We need to look to our selves, in the S-universe, and in the Expansion for principles and constants … and at their ordering phenomena – i.e., differentiate’s slice and splice. Not just look to the B-universe via B-ness and B-speak for laws and norms, and at their order phenomena.
We are missing so much, for lack of differentiate strength, that the human batting average must be something like .050. And falling. That’s what we amount to. And our dependence on statutes, a control system, to manage behaviors (actions, not acts) in the absence of effective mettles and mettle alloys, an operating system, shows it.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2021 R. F. Carter
Just as we should sight along the line of the Expansion and its differentiation, so too should we view our lives by sighting along the line of our selves (individual and community) and our differentiating -- not across lives in the style of B-ness and B-speak. Too much behavior, past and possible, is otherwise forfeit. B-ness does not make enough of functionality in relation to needed functionality … as, for example, in the undifferentiated confusion between want and need.
Consider too the behavior between (the two cross-sectional views of) a “stimulus” and a “response.” Boring estimated there could be 30 or so intervening conditions. How many mettles? Which mettles? Any alloyed mettles? S-universe differentiation is the path to solving our Solve problem.
We humans are more like the Expansion than we are like the B-universe. In our functionality, that is. In the extent of our differentiation. We differentiate; we make steps (splicing), not just take them. In light of the Nature of Things.
We need to look to our selves, in the S-universe, and in the Expansion for principles and constants … and at their ordering phenomena – i.e., differentiate’s slice and splice. Not just look to the B-universe via B-ness and B-speak for laws and norms, and at their order phenomena.
We are missing so much, for lack of differentiate strength, that the human batting average must be something like .050. And falling. That’s what we amount to. And our dependence on statutes, a control system, to manage behaviors (actions, not acts) in the absence of effective mettles and mettle alloys, an operating system, shows it.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2021 R. F. Carter
S