C-246.2 A grand accord
Much is desired and said of living in harmony with nature. With the things of nature, that is … seeing ourselves as one of many things of nature. As if Adapt and Adopt were strategy enough for us. In doing so, however, we employ the lesser Involve, the B-universe, rather than the Expansion’s Nature of Things, to Grasp the human condition. And suffer for the absence of Adept as a strategy, of its development as capability – with all the mettle strengthening thus implied. Suffering given this shortsighted view of the functionality necessitated by the Nature of Things. Suffering due to the impoverished Mind technology of B-ness and B-speak plus Oneness. Suffering due to promotion of the B-universe over the Expansion and the S-universe.
We need Accord with the Nature of Things. Of which the Expansion is part and party. In which differentiation is process and not just product.* In which differentiate is principle as well as phenomenon … such that we become proficient in “slice and splice” procedural technology.
***
* Ironically, a B-speak dictionary comprises a summary of differentiations while entertaining uncounted instances that betray a lack of differentiation (e.g., many words ending in “-ion” – including “differentiation”; see thoughtknots). The structure of process is thereby violated, at best only refracted in “producer” and “product,” and we stand, AT and ON the Frontier, bereft of the operating system and principles we need given the Nature of Things. It’s too easy to miss just how much of behavior is lost to B-ness and B-speak.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2021 R. F. Carter
We need Accord with the Nature of Things. Of which the Expansion is part and party. In which differentiation is process and not just product.* In which differentiate is principle as well as phenomenon … such that we become proficient in “slice and splice” procedural technology.
* Ironically, a B-speak dictionary comprises a summary of differentiations while entertaining uncounted instances that betray a lack of differentiation (e.g., many words ending in “-ion” – including “differentiation”; see thoughtknots). The structure of process is thereby violated, at best only refracted in “producer” and “product,” and we stand, AT and ON the Frontier, bereft of the operating system and principles we need given the Nature of Things. It’s too easy to miss just how much of behavior is lost to B-ness and B-speak.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2021 R. F. Carter
S