C-203. Find, Try and Trial
Consider these as R-words, as three kinds of steps seeking needed functionality. They are similar in this regard. They differ in step-taking tactics and strategies. Currently, given B-ness, they are similar in meta-strategy. And they should not be. They should differ in step making. They should recognize the differences in “Know” as an R-word. Find (Kf) is similar to Try (Kt) in its B-ness. But Trial (KMmt), if seen as an R-word, adds a new layer of contingency (R-spacetime and the R-transform [to replace the B-transform*]) to step making. Trial thus becomes more of a hypothesis, re structure of process, than Try is. (See “Try, try and try again” and “Whatever it takes” – i.e. with the emphasis on effort – versus “All that it takes” – i.e., with the emphasis on missing architectural units.**)
B-ness has given us an incomplete and inaccurate picture of step making and taking. See O:S-P, with consequences for our partially and incompletely solved problems (O:Sp, Ps and P). We have focused on, and talked about, bodies and their (not further specified) “behaviors” … to the neglect of what is called for, of what there is to be talked about, of needed steps and actors prepared to make (App. XXIII) and take them. Of specified needed steps, of steps strengthened via development’s < CEM > mechanism in Accord with the Nature of Things, with History – and not collapsing the behavioral problem (Pbeh) into this or that situational problem (Psit), thus confounding them.
***
* Transform: How we Read the Expansion – and in which spacetime.
** We can tolerate “behavioral.” Because as an adjective – or adverb – its putdown of step making and taking by B-ness is made apparent.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available in the home page, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2020 R. F. Carter
B-ness has given us an incomplete and inaccurate picture of step making and taking. See O:S-P, with consequences for our partially and incompletely solved problems (O:Sp, Ps and P). We have focused on, and talked about, bodies and their (not further specified) “behaviors” … to the neglect of what is called for, of what there is to be talked about, of needed steps and actors prepared to make (App. XXIII) and take them. Of specified needed steps, of steps strengthened via development’s < CEM > mechanism in Accord with the Nature of Things, with History – and not collapsing the behavioral problem (Pbeh) into this or that situational problem (Psit), thus confounding them.
* Transform: How we Read the Expansion – and in which spacetime.
** We can tolerate “behavioral.” Because as an adjective – or adverb – its putdown of step making and taking by B-ness is made apparent.
In light of the very useful Search feature now available in the home page, parenthetical back references are suspended for Comments as of C-184.
(c) 2020 R. F. Carter
S